California Nanotechnologies Company Insiders
CNO Stock | CAD 0.51 0.03 5.56% |
California Nanotechnologies employs about 4 people. The company is managed by 4 executives with a total tenure of roughly 18 years, averaging almost 4.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Recap of California Nanotechnologies' management performance can provide insight into the venture performance.
California |
California Nanotechnologies Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.2198 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.2198 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.1286) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. California Nanotechnologies' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well California Nanotechnologies manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to climb to 0.16 in 2025. Return On Capital Employed is likely to climb to 0.48 in 2025. At this time, California Nanotechnologies' Total Current Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Intangible Assets is likely to climb to 3,682 in 2025, whereas Net Tangible Assets are likely to drop (1.2 M) in 2025.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 38.6 M in 2025. Net Loss is likely to drop to about (67.7 K) in 2025
California Nanotechnologies Workforce Comparison
California Nanotechnologies Corp is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Materials industry is currently estimated at about 1,058. California Nanotechnologies adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of all equities under Materials industry.
California Nanotechnologies Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (0.03) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of (0.35) %, which suggests for every $100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating loss of $0.35.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.7 | 0.7377 |
|
|
California Nanotechnologies Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. California Nanotechnologies Price Series Summation is a cross summation of California Nanotechnologies price series and its benchmark/peer.
California Nanotechnologies Notable Stakeholders
A California Nanotechnologies stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as California Nanotechnologies often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. California Nanotechnologies' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting California Nanotechnologies' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Eric Eyerman | Interim CEO, Director | Profile | |
Christopher Melnyk | Director Director | Profile | |
Mikel Damke | Exec Officer | Profile | |
Spencer Song | Vice Operations | Profile |
About California Nanotechnologies Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as California Nanotechnologies often depends on how effective the management is. California Nanotechnologies management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of California management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the California management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | (0.03) | 0.16 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.38 | 0.48 | |
Return On Assets | (0.03) | 0.16 | |
Return On Equity | (0.07) | 2.61 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in California Nanotechnologies' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of California Nanotechnologies Corp. Check California Nanotechnologies' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of California Nanotechnologies' management manipulating its earnings.
California Nanotechnologies Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as California Nanotechnologies use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare California Nanotechnologies within its industry.California Nanotechnologies Manpower Efficiency
Return on California Nanotechnologies Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 1.6M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 1.6M | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 39.6K | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 39.6K |
Additional Tools for California Stock Analysis
When running California Nanotechnologies' price analysis, check to measure California Nanotechnologies' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy California Nanotechnologies is operating at the current time. Most of California Nanotechnologies' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of California Nanotechnologies' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move California Nanotechnologies' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of California Nanotechnologies to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.