Procter Gamble Company Top Insiders
PG Stock | USD 160.54 2.40 1.52% |
Roughly 75% of Procter Gamble's corporate insiders are selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Procter Gamble stock suggests that many insiders are alarmed at this time. Procter Gamble employs about 107 K people. The company is managed by 73 executives with a total tenure of roughly 545 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 1465.75 employees per reported executive.
Martin Riant CEO Group Pres and Advisor to the CEO |
Alan Lafley Chairman Executive Chairman and Member of Proxy Committee |
Procter Gamble's Insider Buying Vs Selling
25
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-03-04 | R. Alexandra Keith | Disposed 776 @ 158.11 | View | ||
2024-02-23 | Gary A Coombe | Disposed 22000 @ 161.32 | View | ||
2024-02-15 | Lloyd Doggett | Acquired @ 157.01 | |||
2024-01-29 | Ma. Fatima Francisco | Disposed 45000 @ 156 | View | ||
2024-01-25 | Shailesh Jejurikar | Disposed 31275 @ 154.9 | View | ||
2024-01-24 | Marc S Pritchard | Disposed 101704 @ 153.57 | View | ||
2024-01-23 | Kathy E. Manning | Acquired @ 153.98 | |||
2024-01-19 | Tommy Tuberville | Acquired @ 147.61 | |||
2023-12-04 | John R. Curtis | Disposed @ 152.05 | |||
2023-11-30 | R. Alexandra Keith | Disposed 6575 @ 153.47 | View | ||
2023-11-15 | Lloyd Doggett | Acquired @ 151.42 | |||
2023-11-14 | R. Alexandra Keith | Disposed 19661 @ 153.47 | View | ||
2023-11-06 | Andre Schulten | Disposed 40298 @ 150.61 | View | ||
2023-10-31 | Pete Sessions | Disposed @ 150.03 | |||
2023-10-27 | Moses Victor Javier Aguilar | Disposed 7946 @ 147.09 | View | ||
2023-10-24 | R. Alexandra Keith | Disposed 1868 @ 150 | View |
Monitoring Procter Gamble's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Procter Gamble's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Procter Gamble. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Procter Gamble's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
Procter |
Procter Gamble's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Procter Gamble's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Procter will maintain a workforce of roughly 110000 employees by May 2024.Procter Gamble's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Procter Gamble, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Procter Gamble by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2023-10-24 | Representative Greg Stanton | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2023-09-21 | Senator John P Ricketts | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
2023-09-11 | Representative C. Scott Franklin | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2022-12-09 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2022-08-03 | Representative Debbie Dingell | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2022-06-16 | Representative Diana Harshbarger | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2022-06-10 | Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2022-01-19 | Representative Pete Sessions | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2021-11-02 | Representative Dan Newhouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-05-11 | Representative K. Michael Conaway | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-04-16 | Senator David A Perdue , Jr | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-04-16 | Representative Richard W. Allen | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-04-07 | Senator Kelly Loeffler | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-02-20 | Representative Mikie Sherrill | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-01-13 | Senator James M. Inhofe | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
2019-02-27 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2018-08-02 | Senator Patrick J. Toomey | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2017-01-20 | Senator John Hoeven | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
2014-06-19 | Senator Susan M. Collins | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2014-06-19 | Senator Susan M Collins | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Procter Gamble Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.1116 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.1116. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.3179 %, which means that it produced $0.3179 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Procter Gamble's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Procter Gamble manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to decrease to 0.14. The current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to decrease to 0.20. At this time, Procter Gamble's Other Assets are most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The Procter Gamble's current Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 0.99, while Non Current Assets Total are projected to decrease to roughly 65.5 B.The Procter Gamble's current Common Stock Shares Outstanding is estimated to increase to about 2.3 B, while Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is projected to decrease to roughly 10.6 B.
Procter Gamble Workforce Comparison
Procter Gamble is regarded second in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Consumer Staples industry is at this time estimated at about 313,086. Procter Gamble totals roughly 107,000 in number of employees claiming about 34% of stocks in Consumer Staples industry.
Procter Gamble Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.18 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.23 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.23.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.38 | 0.43 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.088 | 0.16 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.13 | 0.2 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.12 | 0.2 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.0706 | 0.11 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.18 | 0.28 |
|
|
Procter Gamble Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Procter Gamble insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Procter Gamble's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Procter Gamble insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-01 | 1.04 | 26 | 25 | 382,704 | 778,957 |
2023-12-01 | 1.3269 | 69 | 52 | 857,458 | 154,298 |
2023-09-01 | 1.9167 | 69 | 36 | 317,682 | 397,668 |
2023-06-01 | 1.125 | 27 | 24 | 117,088 | 242,318 |
2023-03-01 | 1.125 | 18 | 16 | 2,043 | 209,541 |
2022-12-01 | 1.8611 | 67 | 36 | 758,988 | 88,940 |
2022-09-01 | 1.3056 | 47 | 36 | 276,824 | 695,610 |
2022-06-01 | 1.0667 | 16 | 15 | 108,078 | 269,091 |
2022-03-01 | 0.8529 | 29 | 34 | 650,041 | 1,238,719 |
2021-12-01 | 1.4107 | 79 | 56 | 1,391,679 | 315,262 |
2021-09-01 | 1.5094 | 80 | 53 | 958,343 | 1,215,360 |
2021-06-01 | 0.8387 | 26 | 31 | 420,448 | 3,857,289 |
2021-03-01 | 0.5349 | 23 | 43 | 98,002 | 1,630,932 |
2020-12-01 | 1.1519 | 91 | 79 | 1,586,138 | 1,000,510 |
2020-09-01 | 1.4091 | 93 | 66 | 1,353,322 | 1,892,266 |
2020-06-01 | 0.9231 | 24 | 26 | 234,886 | 20,563,612 |
2020-03-01 | 1.2083 | 58 | 48 | 1,871,013 | 2,137,497 |
2019-12-01 | 0.7794 | 53 | 68 | 183,523 | 4,830,351 |
2019-09-01 | 1.6731 | 87 | 52 | 948,035 | 928,891 |
2019-06-01 | 0.7193 | 41 | 57 | 406,575 | 933,789 |
2019-03-01 | 1.1286 | 79 | 70 | 1,955,460 | 2,350,806 |
2018-12-01 | 0.7757 | 83 | 107 | 1,128,440 | 1,959,641 |
2018-09-01 | 1.0541 | 117 | 111 | 603,492 | 512,319 |
2018-06-01 | 3.4286 | 24 | 7 | 4,492 | 40,163 |
2018-03-01 | 1.6757 | 62 | 37 | 2,167,519 | 751,568 |
2017-12-01 | 1.7 | 34 | 20 | 51,880 | 85,968 |
2017-09-01 | 1.6207 | 94 | 58 | 860,404 | 228,073 |
2017-06-01 | 1.3158 | 25 | 19 | 191,459 | 392,694 |
2017-03-01 | 0.9412 | 64 | 68 | 2,502,658 | 1,655,457 |
2016-12-01 | 2.8889 | 26 | 9 | 14,179 | 10,795 |
2016-09-01 | 1.0388 | 107 | 103 | 1,053,898 | 1,218,026 |
2016-06-01 | 0.9167 | 22 | 24 | 183,086 | 555,570 |
2016-03-01 | 0.7625 | 61 | 80 | 1,921,440 | 2,352,375 |
2015-12-01 | 1.1 | 33 | 30 | 468,714 | 918,580 |
2015-09-01 | 1.4561 | 83 | 57 | 557,436 | 517,712 |
2015-06-01 | 1.75 | 21 | 12 | 62,626 | 117,003 |
2015-03-01 | 1.0 | 46 | 46 | 1,474,548 | 1,580,092 |
2014-12-01 | 1.069 | 31 | 29 | 154,048 | 288,969 |
2014-09-01 | 1.1111 | 100 | 90 | 867,455 | 952,077 |
2014-06-01 | 0.6458 | 31 | 48 | 576,907 | 1,381,335 |
2014-03-01 | 0.82 | 41 | 50 | 1,594,217 | 1,558,889 |
2013-12-01 | 0.8556 | 77 | 90 | 238,926 | 417,312 |
2013-09-01 | 1.0274 | 75 | 73 | 434,785 | 306,724 |
2013-06-01 | 0.9333 | 14 | 15 | 27,412 | 65,872 |
2013-03-01 | 0.76 | 38 | 50 | 1,531,200 | 1,023,953 |
2012-12-01 | 1.75 | 28 | 16 | 99,556 | 131,764 |
2012-09-01 | 1.0175 | 58 | 57 | 783,384 | 785,824 |
2012-06-01 | 1.4545 | 16 | 11 | 13,173 | 21,561 |
2012-03-01 | 0.7727 | 34 | 44 | 1,409,788 | 1,569,809 |
2011-12-01 | 2.0 | 22 | 11 | 40,684 | 48,444 |
2011-09-01 | 0.9091 | 30 | 33 | 103,990 | 165,870 |
2011-06-01 | 0.8824 | 15 | 17 | 32,421 | 74,265 |
2011-03-01 | 0.8056 | 29 | 36 | 1,376,740 | 1,227,285 |
2010-12-01 | 1.1481 | 31 | 27 | 153,190 | 260,334 |
2010-09-01 | 1.4634 | 60 | 41 | 255,261 | 62,719 |
2010-06-01 | 1.2 | 18 | 15 | 21,633 | 36,923 |
2010-03-01 | 0.8333 | 35 | 42 | 1,414,117 | 1,597,533 |
2009-12-01 | 1.3913 | 32 | 23 | 72,521 | 105,198 |
2009-09-01 | 1.3125 | 63 | 48 | 77,948 | 124,647 |
2009-06-01 | 0.2857 | 4 | 14 | 1,981 | 22,412 |
2009-03-01 | 0.6667 | 26 | 39 | 2,399,435 | 1,259,414 |
2008-12-01 | 0.2453 | 13 | 53 | 30,819 | 65,753 |
2008-09-01 | 0.75 | 51 | 68 | 209,896 | 372,576 |
2008-06-01 | 0.2766 | 13 | 47 | 60,732 | 75,897 |
2008-03-01 | 0.7018 | 40 | 57 | 2,220,332 | 1,534,916 |
2007-12-01 | 0.2941 | 15 | 51 | 75,478 | 208,584 |
2007-09-01 | 0.5795 | 51 | 88 | 335,252 | 431,295 |
2007-06-01 | 0.3077 | 12 | 39 | 169,347 | 288,204 |
2007-03-01 | 0.7609 | 35 | 46 | 1,688,661 | 538,913 |
2006-12-01 | 1.2105 | 23 | 19 | 22,379 | 55,158 |
2006-09-01 | 1.4231 | 37 | 26 | 263,742 | 113,670 |
2006-06-01 | 1.1176 | 19 | 17 | 141,326 | 287,938 |
2006-03-01 | 0.6538 | 34 | 52 | 1,734,086 | 557,340 |
2005-12-01 | 1.3158 | 25 | 19 | 45,034 | 30,186 |
2005-09-01 | 0.766 | 36 | 47 | 549,774 | 783,684 |
2005-06-01 | 0.6923 | 9 | 13 | 55,112 | 131,597 |
2005-03-01 | 1.3333 | 24 | 18 | 1,822,131 | 324,502 |
2004-12-01 | 1.2857 | 27 | 21 | 40,894 | 65,815 |
2004-09-01 | 0.9767 | 42 | 43 | 617,346 | 1,004,462 |
2004-06-01 | 0.7778 | 28 | 36 | 100,895 | 222,311 |
2004-03-01 | 3.0556 | 55 | 18 | 1,048,651 | 137,698 |
2003-12-01 | 0.6452 | 20 | 31 | 37,268 | 90,856 |
2003-09-01 | 0.9412 | 32 | 34 | 204,254 | 471,748 |
2003-06-01 | 3.0 | 9 | 3 | 283.03 | 10,077 |
2003-03-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 204.34 | 1.00 |
2002-09-01 | 0.1 | 3 | 30 | 242.81 | 367,246 |
Procter Gamble Notable Stakeholders
A Procter Gamble stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Procter Gamble often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Procter Gamble's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Procter Gamble's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Martin Riant | Group Pres and Advisor to the CEO | Profile | |
Fama Francisco | Chief Executive Officer - Baby and Feminine Care | Profile | |
Ma Francisco | Chief Executive Officer - Baby and Feminine Care | Profile | |
Shailesh Jejurikar | Chief Operating Officer, Chief Executive Officer - Fabric and Home Care | Profile | |
Alan Lafley | Executive Chairman and Member of Proxy Committee | Profile | |
David Taylor | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Jon Moeller | Vice Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Mary FergusonMcHugh | Group President - Global Family Care and Global Brand Creation and Innovation, P&G Ventures | Profile | |
Hatsunori Kiriyama | President - Asia | Profile | |
Magesvaran Suranjan | President - Asia Pacific Selling and Market Operations | Profile | |
Tarek Farahat | President - Latin America | Profile | |
Mohamed Samir | President - India, Middle East and Africa (IMEA) Selling and Market Operations | Profile | |
Alexandra Keith | President - Global Hair Care and Beauty Sector | Profile | |
Valarie Sheppard | Controller and Treasurer and Executive Vice President - Company Transition Leader | Profile | |
Giovanni Ciserani | Group President of Global Fabric and Home Care and Global Baby and Feminine Care | Profile | |
Steven Bishop | Group President - Global Feminine and Family Care | Profile | |
Juan Posada | President - Latin America Selling and Market Operations | Profile | |
Matthew Price | President - Greater China Selling and Market Operations | Profile | |
Julio Nemeth | President - Global Business Services | Profile | |
Patrice Louvet | Group President - Global Beauty | Profile | |
Charles Pierce | Group President - Global Grooming | Profile | |
Gary Coombe | President - Europe Selling and Market Operations | Profile | |
Carolyn Tastad | Group President - North America Selling and Market Operations | Profile | |
Andre Schulten | Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
Kenneth Chenault | Independent Director | Profile | |
Amy Chang | Independent Director | Profile | |
Nelson Peltz | Independent Director | Profile | |
Francis Blake | Independent Director | Profile | |
Susan DesmondHellmann | Independent Director | Profile | |
Margaret Whitman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Walter McNerney | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Terry Lundgren | Independent Director | Profile | |
Angela Braly | Independent Director | Profile | |
James McNerney | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Ernesto Zedillo | Independent Director | Profile | |
Scott Cook | Independent Director | Profile | |
Ernesto Leon | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Chevalier | Director - Investor Relations | Profile | |
Patricia Woertz | Independent Director | Profile | |
Joseph Jimenez | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Kathleen Fish | Chief Research, Development and Innovation Officer | Profile | |
Craig Buchholz | Chief Communications Officer and Vice President – Communications, Personal Health Care and Oral Care | Profile | |
Matthew Janzaruk | Senior Officer | Profile | |
Debra Lee | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mindy Sherwood | President Global Walmart | Profile | |
Kirti Singh | Chief Analytics and Insights Officer | Profile | |
Thomas Finn | President - Personal Health Care | Profile | |
Loic Tassel | President - Europe | Profile | |
Shelly McNamara | Senior Vice President of Human Resources | Profile | |
M Grabowski | Chief Human Resource Officer | Profile | |
Victor Aguilar | Chief Research, Development and Innovation Officer | Profile | |
Damon Jones | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Javier Polit | Chief Information Officer | Profile | |
B Allen | Independent Director | Profile | |
Henry Karamanoukian | President Go-to-Market, China and Hair Care, Greater China | Profile | |
Sundar Raman | President - Fabric Care, North America and P&G Professional, Global | Profile | |
Susan Whaley | Chief Secretary | Profile | |
R Keith | President - Global Hair Care and Beauty Sector | Profile | |
Yannis Skoufalos | Global Product Supply Officer | Profile | |
Linda ClementHolmes | CIO | Profile | |
Jennifer Davis | President - Feminine Care | Profile | |
Fatima Francisco | Feminine Baby | Profile | |
Jeffrey Schomburger | Global Sales Officer | Profile | |
Monica Turner | Senior Vice President - Sales, North America | Profile | |
Vittorio Cretella | Chief Information Officer | Profile | |
Christine McCarthy | Independent Director | Profile | |
Philip Duncan | Chief Design Officer | Profile | |
Marc Pritchard | Global Brand Building Officer | Profile | |
Markus Strobel | President - Skin & Personal Care | Profile | |
Mark Biegger | Global Human Resources Officer | Profile | |
Laura Becker | President - Global Business Services | Profile | |
Deborah Majoras | Chief Legal Officer, Secretary | Profile | |
Ken Patel | Chief Counsel | Profile |
About Procter Gamble Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Procter Gamble often depends on how effective the management is. Procter Gamble management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Procter management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Procter management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.23 | 0.14 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.25 | 0.20 | |
Return On Assets | 0.11 | 0.07 | |
Return On Equity | 0.28 | 0.18 |
The data published in Procter Gamble's official financial statements usually reflect Procter Gamble's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Procter Gamble. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Procter accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Procter Gamble's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Household Products space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Procter Gamble's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Procter Gamble's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Procter Gamble's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Procter Gamble. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Procter Gamble's management manipulating its earnings.
Procter Gamble Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Procter Gamble use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Procter Gamble within its industry.Procter Gamble Manpower Efficiency
Return on Procter Gamble Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 766.4K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 1.1B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 137.7K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 201.9M |
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Procter Gamble. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price. For more detail on how to invest in Procter Stock please use our How to Invest in Procter Gamble guide.Note that the Procter Gamble information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Procter Gamble's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.
Complementary Tools for Procter Stock analysis
When running Procter Gamble's price analysis, check to measure Procter Gamble's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Procter Gamble is operating at the current time. Most of Procter Gamble's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Procter Gamble's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Procter Gamble's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Procter Gamble to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
AI Investment Finder Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data |
Is Procter Gamble's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Procter Gamble. If investors know Procter will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Procter Gamble listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.106 | Dividend Share 3.763 | Earnings Share 6.12 | Revenue Per Share 35.616 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.006 |
The market value of Procter Gamble is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Procter that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Procter Gamble's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Procter Gamble's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Procter Gamble's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Procter Gamble's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Procter Gamble's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Procter Gamble is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Procter Gamble's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.