Correlation Between Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bristol Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly and, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bristol Myers with a short position of Eli Lilly. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly.

Diversification Opportunities for Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly

0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bristol and Eli is 0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bristol Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly and in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Eli Lilly and Bristol Myers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bristol Myers Squibb are associated (or correlated) with Eli Lilly. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Eli Lilly has no effect on the direction of Bristol Myers i.e., Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bristol Myers Squibb is expected to under-perform the Eli Lilly. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bristol Myers Squibb is 1.1 times less risky than Eli Lilly. The stock trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Eli Lilly and is currently generating about -0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  77,490  in Eli Lilly and on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (4,270) from holding Eli Lilly and or give up 5.51% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bristol Myers Squibb  vs.  Eli Lilly and

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bristol Myers Squibb 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bristol Myers Squibb has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Bristol Myers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Eli Lilly 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Eli Lilly and are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak essential indicators, Eli Lilly showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bristol Myers and Eli Lilly positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bristol Myers position performs unexpectedly, Eli Lilly can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Eli Lilly will offset losses from the drop in Eli Lilly's long position.
The idea behind Bristol Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly and pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world