Correlation Between GM and Johnson Johnson

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Johnson Johnson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Johnson Johnson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Johnson Johnson, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Johnson Johnson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Johnson Johnson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Johnson Johnson.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Johnson Johnson

-0.76
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between GM and Johnson is -0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Johnson Johnson in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Johnson Johnson and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Johnson Johnson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Johnson Johnson has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Johnson Johnson go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Johnson Johnson

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 1.11 times more return on investment than Johnson Johnson. However, GM is 1.11 times more volatile than Johnson Johnson. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Johnson Johnson is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,285  in General Motors on January 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (41.00) from holding General Motors or give up 0.96% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Johnson Johnson

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Johnson Johnson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Johnson Johnson has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's forward-looking indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

GM and Johnson Johnson Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Johnson Johnson

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Johnson Johnson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Johnson Johnson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Johnson Johnson will offset losses from the drop in Johnson Johnson's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Johnson Johnson pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance