Correlation Between GM and McDonalds

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and McDonalds at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and McDonalds into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and McDonalds, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and McDonalds and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of McDonalds. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and McDonalds.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and McDonalds

-0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between GM and McDonalds is -0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and McDonalds in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on McDonalds and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with McDonalds. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of McDonalds has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and McDonalds go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and McDonalds

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 2.1 times more return on investment than McDonalds. However, GM is 2.1 times more volatile than McDonalds. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. McDonalds is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,391  in General Motors on January 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  864.00  from holding General Motors or generate 25.48% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  McDonalds

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
McDonalds 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days McDonalds has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unfluctuating performance, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.

GM and McDonalds Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and McDonalds

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and McDonalds positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, McDonalds can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in McDonalds will offset losses from the drop in McDonalds' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and McDonalds pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.