Correlation Between Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guidepath Servative Allocation and Guidemark E Fixed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guidepath(r) Conservative with a short position of Guidemark. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark.

Diversification Opportunities for Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guidepath(r) and Guidemark is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guidepath Servative Allocation and Guidemark E Fixed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guidemark E Fixed and Guidepath(r) Conservative is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guidepath Servative Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Guidemark. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guidemark E Fixed has no effect on the direction of Guidepath(r) Conservative i.e., Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guidepath Servative Allocation is expected to generate 1.13 times more return on investment than Guidemark. However, Guidepath(r) Conservative is 1.13 times more volatile than Guidemark E Fixed. It trades about 0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guidemark E Fixed is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,118  in Guidepath Servative Allocation on April 25, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  70.00  from holding Guidepath Servative Allocation or generate 6.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guidepath Servative Allocation  vs.  Guidemark E Fixed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guidepath(r) Conservative 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guidepath Servative Allocation are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Guidepath(r) Conservative may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
Guidemark E Fixed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guidemark E Fixed are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Guidemark is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guidepath(r) Conservative and Guidemark positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guidepath(r) Conservative position performs unexpectedly, Guidemark can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guidemark will offset losses from the drop in Guidemark's long position.
The idea behind Guidepath Servative Allocation and Guidemark E Fixed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites