Correlation Between Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Intermediate Capital Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Intermediate Capital with a short position of Concurrent Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies.
Diversification Opportunities for Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies
0.7 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Intermediate and Concurrent is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Intermediate Capital Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Concurrent Technologies and Intermediate Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Intermediate Capital Group are associated (or correlated) with Concurrent Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Concurrent Technologies has no effect on the direction of Intermediate Capital i.e., Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Intermediate Capital Group is expected to generate 0.78 times more return on investment than Concurrent Technologies. However, Intermediate Capital Group is 1.28 times less risky than Concurrent Technologies. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Concurrent Technologies Plc is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest 169,946 in Intermediate Capital Group on April 21, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 45,654 from holding Intermediate Capital Group or generate 26.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Intermediate Capital Group vs. Concurrent Technologies Plc
Performance |
Timeline |
Intermediate Capital |
Concurrent Technologies |
Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies
The main advantage of trading using opposite Intermediate Capital and Concurrent Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Intermediate Capital position performs unexpectedly, Concurrent Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Concurrent Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Concurrent Technologies' long position.Intermediate Capital vs. Samsung Electronics Co | Intermediate Capital vs. Samsung Electronics Co | Intermediate Capital vs. Samsung Electronics Co | Intermediate Capital vs. Toyota Motor Corp |
Concurrent Technologies vs. MT Bank Corp | Concurrent Technologies vs. Commerzbank AG | Concurrent Technologies vs. Liechtensteinische Landesbank AG | Concurrent Technologies vs. Metro Bank PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories |