Correlation Between Information Services and UnitedHealth Group
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Information Services and UnitedHealth Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Information Services and UnitedHealth Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Information Services and UnitedHealth Group CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Information Services and UnitedHealth Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Information Services with a short position of UnitedHealth Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Information Services and UnitedHealth Group.
Diversification Opportunities for Information Services and UnitedHealth Group
-0.73 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Information and UnitedHealth is -0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Information Services and UnitedHealth Group CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on UnitedHealth Group CDR and Information Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Information Services are associated (or correlated) with UnitedHealth Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of UnitedHealth Group CDR has no effect on the direction of Information Services i.e., Information Services and UnitedHealth Group go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Information Services and UnitedHealth Group
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Information Services is expected to generate 0.43 times more return on investment than UnitedHealth Group. However, Information Services is 2.32 times less risky than UnitedHealth Group. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. UnitedHealth Group CDR is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest 2,667 in Information Services on April 20, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 583.00 from holding Information Services or generate 21.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Information Services vs. UnitedHealth Group CDR
Performance |
Timeline |
Information Services |
UnitedHealth Group CDR |
Information Services and UnitedHealth Group Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Information Services and UnitedHealth Group
The main advantage of trading using opposite Information Services and UnitedHealth Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Information Services position performs unexpectedly, UnitedHealth Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in UnitedHealth Group will offset losses from the drop in UnitedHealth Group's long position.Information Services vs. Mayfair Acquisition | Information Services vs. Highwood Asset Management | Information Services vs. Solid Impact Investments | Information Services vs. Primaris Retail RE |
UnitedHealth Group vs. Richelieu Hardware | UnitedHealth Group vs. Titanium Transportation Group | UnitedHealth Group vs. Highwood Asset Management | UnitedHealth Group vs. Mako Mining Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum |