Correlation Between Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cogent Communications Holdings and Mobilezone Holding AG, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cogent Communications with a short position of Mobilezone Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding

-0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cogent and Mobilezone is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cogent Communications Holdings and Mobilezone Holding AG in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mobilezone Holding and Cogent Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cogent Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Mobilezone Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mobilezone Holding has no effect on the direction of Cogent Communications i.e., Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cogent Communications is expected to generate 5.13 times less return on investment than Mobilezone Holding. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Cogent Communications Holdings is 1.89 times less risky than Mobilezone Holding. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mobilezone Holding AG is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  889.00  in Mobilezone Holding AG on April 20, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  307.00  from holding Mobilezone Holding AG or generate 34.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cogent Communications Holdings  vs.  Mobilezone Holding AG

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cogent Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile primary indicators, Cogent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
Mobilezone Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mobilezone Holding AG are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, Mobilezone Holding unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cogent Communications and Mobilezone Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cogent Communications position performs unexpectedly, Mobilezone Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mobilezone Holding will offset losses from the drop in Mobilezone Holding's long position.
The idea behind Cogent Communications Holdings and Mobilezone Holding AG pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope