Correlation Between Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial and Seagate Technology Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sumitomo Mitsui with a short position of Seagate Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology

0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sumitomo and Seagate is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sumitomo Mitsui Financial and Seagate Technology Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Seagate Technology and Sumitomo Mitsui is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sumitomo Mitsui Financial are associated (or correlated) with Seagate Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Seagate Technology has no effect on the direction of Sumitomo Mitsui i.e., Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Sumitomo Mitsui is expected to generate 1.13 times less return on investment than Seagate Technology. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial is 1.12 times less risky than Seagate Technology. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Seagate Technology Holdings is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  23,455  in Seagate Technology Holdings on April 20, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  60,137  from holding Seagate Technology Holdings or generate 256.39% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy58.66%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial  vs.  Seagate Technology Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sumitomo Mitsui Financial are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong primary indicators, Sumitomo Mitsui is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Seagate Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Seagate Technology Holdings are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Seagate Technology sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sumitomo Mitsui and Seagate Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sumitomo Mitsui position performs unexpectedly, Seagate Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Seagate Technology will offset losses from the drop in Seagate Technology's long position.
The idea behind Sumitomo Mitsui Financial and Seagate Technology Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities