Correlation Between Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Thrivent Natural Resources and Guidemark Large Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Thrivent Natural with a short position of Guidemark(r) Large. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large.

Diversification Opportunities for Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large

0.91
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Thrivent and Guidemark(r) is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Thrivent Natural Resources and Guidemark Large Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guidemark Large Cap and Thrivent Natural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Thrivent Natural Resources are associated (or correlated) with Guidemark(r) Large. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guidemark Large Cap has no effect on the direction of Thrivent Natural i.e., Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large

Assuming the 90 days horizon Thrivent Natural is expected to generate 12.95 times less return on investment than Guidemark(r) Large. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Thrivent Natural Resources is 9.37 times less risky than Guidemark(r) Large. It trades about 0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guidemark Large Cap is currently generating about 0.36 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,827  in Guidemark Large Cap on April 21, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  613.00  from holding Guidemark Large Cap or generate 21.68% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Thrivent Natural Resources  vs.  Guidemark Large Cap

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Thrivent Natural Res 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thrivent Natural Resources are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Thrivent Natural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Guidemark Large Cap 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guidemark Large Cap are ranked lower than 27 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Guidemark(r) Large showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large

The main advantage of trading using opposite Thrivent Natural and Guidemark(r) Large positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Thrivent Natural position performs unexpectedly, Guidemark(r) Large can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guidemark(r) Large will offset losses from the drop in Guidemark(r) Large's long position.
The idea behind Thrivent Natural Resources and Guidemark Large Cap pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity