Pimco Energy Tactical Fund Price To Earning
| PDX Fund | 24.84 0.06 0.24% |
By evaluating key metrics such as revenue growth, profitability, cash flow trends, and balance sheet strength, investors can better assess Pimco Energy's long-term financial health and intrinsic value.
Pimco |
Pimco Energy Tactical Fund Price To Earning Analysis
Pimco Energy's Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investors monitor daily. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because when a company's profitability falls, it is likely that earnings will also go down as well. In other words, if you start from a lower position, your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.
| Competition |
Based on the latest financial disclosure, Pimco Energy Tactical has a Price To Earning of 0.0 times. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Category family and 100.0% lower than that of the Family category. The price to earning for all United States funds is 100.0% higher than that of the company.
Pimco Price To Earning Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Pimco Energy's direct or indirect competition against its Price To Earning to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the funds which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Pimco Energy could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Pimco Energy by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Pimco Energy is currently under evaluation in price to earning among similar funds.
Pimco Fundamentals
| Number Of Employees | 11 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 244.99 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.01 % | ||||
| Year To Date Return | 0.38 % | ||||
| One Year Return | 13.33 % | ||||
| Three Year Return | 16.75 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 29.74 % |
About Pimco Energy Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Pimco Energy Tactical's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Pimco Energy using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Pimco Energy Tactical based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this fund, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in Pimco Fund
Pimco Energy financial ratios help investors to determine whether Pimco Fund is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Pimco with respect to the benefits of owning Pimco Energy security.
| Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
| Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals |