Risk Management Stories

Is Farfetch current rise sustainable?

  9 hours ago at Macroaxis 
By Ellen Johnson
This outlook is directed to investors considering a position in Farfetch. We will examine why in spite of recurring disturbance, the long-run fundamental indicators of the company are still stable. Farfetch Working Capital is most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The last year's value of Working Capital was reported at 177.33 Million. The current Asset... [more]
The firm currently holds 293.25 M in liabilities with Debt to Equity (D/E) ratio of 0.23, which may suggest the firm is not taking enough advantage from borrowing. The company's average rating is Buy from 9 analysts. Our buy, hold, or sell recommendation module can be used to complement current analysts and expert consensus on Farfetch. Our buy, hold, or sell suggestions engine makes use of analyzes the firm potential to grow using all fundamental data market data available at the time.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#FF0F00;color: #FFFFF0;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>FA</div>
  9 hours ago at Macroaxis 
By Ellen Johnson
This outlook is directed to investors considering a position in Farfetch. We will examine why in spite of recurring disturbance, the long-run fundamental indicators of the company are still stable. Farfetch Working Capital is most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The last year's value of Working Capital was reported at 177.33 Million. The current Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 0.60, while Average Assets are estimated to decrease to roughly 1.6 B.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#8B008B;color: #ffffff;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>RM</div>
  a day ago at Macroaxis 
By Ellen Johnson
In this story, I am going to address all latest Rocky Mountain shareholders. I will look into why, despite the latest dip, the longer-term fundamental drivers of the firm are still sound. Given the investment horizon of 30 days, Rocky Mountain is expected to generate 2.16 times less return on investment than the market. In addition to that, the company is 2.41 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. The market is currently generating roughly 0.11 per unit of volatility. We estimate Rocky Mountain as currently overvalued. The real value is approaching 3.70 per share.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#FF6600;color: #FFFAFA;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>QI</div>
  a day ago at Macroaxis 
By Achuva Shats
In this story, I am going to address all latest Qudian Inc shareholders. I will look into why, despite the latest dip, the longer-term fundamental drivers of the firm are still sound. Allowing for the 30-days total investment horizon, Qudian Inc is expected to generate 4.5 times more return on investment than the market. However, the company is 4.5 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The market is currently generating roughly 0.11 per unit of risk. We estimate Qudian Inc as currently overvalued. The real value is approaching 1.79 per share.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#FF6600;color: #FFFAFA;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>P1</div>
  a day ago at Macroaxis 
By Ellen Johnson
This perspective is geared to all Pier 1 insiders as well as to investors considering exiting their position in the firm. I will focus on the cause of why it is still reasonable for the firm to generate above-average margins and lots of cash flow. Assuming the 30 trading days horizon, Pier 1 is expected to generate 15.45 times more return on investment than the market. However, the company is 15.45 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The market is currently generating roughly 0.09 per unit of risk.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#82ADFD;color: #ffffff;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>RC</div>
  a day ago at Macroaxis 
By Vlad Skutelnik
This perspective is geared to all Resources Connection insiders as well as to investors considering exiting their position in the firm. I will focus on the cause of why it is still reasonable for the firm to generate above-average margins and lots of cash flow. Considering the 30-days investment horizon, Resources Connection is expected to generate 1.21 times less return on investment than the market. In addition to that, the company is 1.95 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. The market is currently generating roughly 0.09 per unit of volatility. Resources Connection barely shadows the market.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#FF0F00;color: #FFFFF0;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>RT</div>
  a day ago at Macroaxis 
By Raphi Shpitalnik
In this article, we will digest RADIENT TECHNOLOGIES. Why are we still optimistic in an anticipation of a recovery. Assuming the 30 trading days horizon, RADIENT TECHNOLOGIES is expected to generate 7.55 times more return on investment than the market. However, the company is 7.55 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The market is currently generating roughly 0.09 per unit of risk. We estimate RADIENT TECHNOLOGIES as currently overvalued. The real value is approaching 0.10 per share.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#4E8BFC;color: #ffffff;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>SG</div>
  a day ago at Macroaxis 
By Vlad Skutelnik
In this post, we will summarize Simply Good. We will evaluate why recent Simply Good price moves suggest a bounce in August. Given the investment horizon of 30 days, Simply Good is expected to generate 2.39 times more return on investment than the market. However, the company is 2.39 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The market is currently generating roughly 0.09 per unit of risk.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#006400;color: #FFE4E1;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>FA</div>
  2 days ago at Macroaxis 
By Vlad Skutelnik
My story will digest Familymart. We will look into some reasons why it is still possible for Familymart to generate above-average margins and lots of cash flow. Assuming the 30 trading days horizon, Familymart is not expected to generate positive returns. However, the company is 9.223372036854776E16 times less risky than the market. It waists most of its returns potential to compensate for thr risk taken. The market is generating roughly 0.09 per unit of risk.
<div class='circular--portrait-small' style='font-weight: 700;background:#754DEB;color: #F0FFF0;font-size:1.1em;padding-top: 10px;;'>RR</div>
  2 days ago at Macroaxis 
By Raphi Shpitalnik
In this post, I will digest Re Royalties. We will look into why despite regular market tumult, the longer-term fundamental drivers of the firm are still sound. Assuming the 30 trading days horizon, Re Royalties is expected to under-perform the market. In addition to that, the company is 1.52 times more volatile than its market benchmark. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. The market is currently generating roughly 0.1 per unit of volatility.
Macroaxis is not a registered investment advisor or broker/dealer. All investments, including stocks, funds, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies, are speculative and involve substantial risk of loss. We encourage our investors to invest carefully. Much of our information is derived directly from data published by companies or submitted to governmental agencies which we believe are reliable, but are without our independent verification. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the information is accurate or complete. We do not in any way warrant or guarantee the success of any action you take in reliance on our statements or recommendations. Also, note that past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. All investments carry risk, and all investment decisions of an individual remain the responsibility of that individual. There is no guarantee that systems, indicators, or signals will result in profits or that they will not result in losses. All investors are advised to fully understand all risks associated with any investing they choose to do. Hypothetical or simulated performance is not indicative of future results. We make no representations or warranties that any investor will, or is likely to, achieve profits similar to those shown because hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. For more information please visit our terms and condition page