Montana Competitors
| AIRJ Stock | 3.22 0.03 0.92% |
Montana Technologies vs AerSale Corp Correlation
Modest diversification
The correlation between Montana Technologies and ASLE is 0.2 (i.e., Modest diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Montana Technologies and ASLE in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against Montana Stock
| 0.6 | PH | Parker Hannifin | PairCorr |
| 0.57 | FTV | Fortive Corp Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.55 | DCI | Donaldson | PairCorr |
| 0.54 | FLS | Flowserve | PairCorr |
| 0.48 | DOV | Dover | PairCorr |
Montana Technologies Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Montana Technologies and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Montana and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Montana Technologies does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Montana Stock performing well and Montana Technologies Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Montana Technologies' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGEN | 4.09 | (1.08) | 0.00 | (0.50) | 0.00 | 8.10 | 35.03 | |||
| EVI | 2.96 | (0.07) | (0.01) | 0.01 | 3.71 | 5.15 | 16.72 | |||
| ACCO | 1.49 | (0.06) | 0.00 | (0.13) | 0.00 | 3.25 | 9.71 | |||
| MAGN | 3.03 | 0.53 | 0.17 | 0.39 | 2.67 | 8.35 | 34.45 | |||
| PANL | 2.37 | 0.89 | 0.45 | 1.59 | 1.38 | 5.11 | 22.74 | |||
| MG | 2.14 | 0.48 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 1.55 | 4.20 | 27.65 | |||
| BBCP | 1.99 | (0.25) | 0.00 | (0.15) | 0.00 | 3.51 | 15.27 | |||
| SLDP | 4.76 | (0.23) | 0.00 | (0.02) | 0.00 | 9.41 | 72.11 | |||
| CMDB | 1.71 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.99 | 1.62 | 2.64 | 15.86 | |||
| ASLE | 1.48 | (0.14) | 0.00 | (0.12) | 0.00 | 2.92 | 12.15 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Montana Technologies and related stocks such as Tecogen, EVI Industries, and Acco Brands Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGEN | (355.3 K) | (1.6 M) | (1.6 M) | (3.4 M) | (3.7 M) | (2.7 M) | (1.1 M) | 47.4 K | (5.7 M) | (4.7 M) | (6.2 M) | 3.7 M | (2.4 M) | (4.6 M) | (4.8 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.1 M) |
| EVI | 300 K | 511.7 K | 1.6 M | 1.6 M | 1.7 M | 1.7 M | 3.2 M | 4 M | 3.7 M | 775 K | 8.4 M | 4.1 M | 9.7 M | 5.6 M | 7.5 M | 8.6 M | 9.1 M |
| ACCO | 15.7 M | 56.7 M | 115.4 M | 77.1 M | 91.6 M | 85.9 M | 95.5 M | 131.7 M | 106.7 M | 106.8 M | 62 M | 101.9 M | (13.2 M) | (21.8 M) | (101.6 M) | (116.8 M) | (111 M) |
| MAGN | 39.7 M | 42.7 M | 59.4 M | 67.2 M | 69.2 M | 64.6 M | 21.6 M | 7.9 M | (177.6 M) | (21.5 M) | 21.3 M | 6.9 M | (194.2 M) | (79.1 M) | (154 M) | (159 M) | (151.1 M) |
| PANL | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | (2.7 M) | 15.5 M | (12.1 M) | 11.3 M | 7.5 M | 7.8 M | 17.8 M | 11.7 M | 11.4 M | 67.2 M | 79.5 M | 26.3 M | 28.9 M | 33.2 M | 21.5 M |
| MG | 7.4 M | 16.4 M | 21.4 M | 11.6 M | 22.5 M | 16.1 M | 14.5 M | (2.2 M) | 6.8 M | 6.1 M | (99.5 M) | 3.9 M | 6.5 M | (17.5 M) | 19 M | 17.1 M | 17.9 M |
| BBCP | 3.6 M | 3.6 M | 3.6 M | 3.6 M | 3.6 M | 3.5 M | (317.7 K) | 28.4 M | (32.5 M) | (61.3 M) | (15.1 M) | 28.7 M | 31.8 M | 16.2 M | 6.4 M | 7.3 M | 7.7 M |
| SLDP | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (9.2 M) | (14.4 M) | 18.1 M | (9.6 M) | (65.5 M) | (96.5 M) | (86.9 M) | (82.5 M) |
| CMDB | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | 90.4 M | (147.7 M) | (98.3 M) | (88.4 M) | (84 M) |
| ASLE | (31.9 M) | (31.9 M) | (31.9 M) | (31.9 M) | (31.9 M) | (31.9 M) | (31.9 M) | (31.9 M) | 8.9 M | 15.5 M | 8.1 M | 36.1 M | 43.9 M | (5.6 M) | 5.9 M | 6.7 M | 11.1 M |
Montana Technologies and related stocks such as Tecogen, EVI Industries, and Acco Brands Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Montana Technologies financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Montana Technologies operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Montana Technologies Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Montana Technologies competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Montana Technologies' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Montana Technologies' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Montana Technologies Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Montana Technologies Competition
Montana Technologies' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Montana Technologies in relation to its competition. Montana Technologies' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Montana Technologies in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Montana Technologies' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Montana Technologies, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Montana Technologies position
In addition to having Montana Technologies in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Money Market Funds Thematic Idea Now
Money Market Funds
Funds or Etfs investing in various types of short-term (less than one year) fixed income instruments of high-quality and liquidity. The Money Market Funds theme has 42 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Money Market Funds Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Montana Technologies Correlation with its peers. For more information on how to buy Montana Stock please use our How to buy in Montana Stock guide.You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.
What growth prospects exist in Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sector? Can Montana capture new markets? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Montana Technologies. If investors know Montana will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. Valuation analysis balances hard financial data with qualitative growth assessments. While each Montana Technologies valuation metric matters, prioritizing which indicators carry greater predictive weight remains essential.
Understanding Montana Technologies requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Montana's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value—what Montana Technologies' is actually worth based on fundamentals—guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Investment professionals apply varied valuation frameworks to compute inherent worth and acquire positions when market prices trade at discounts to calculated value. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Montana Technologies' price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
Understanding that Montana Technologies' value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Montana Technologies represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. In contrast, Montana Technologies' trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.