Marks Correlations

MA6 Stock  EUR 4.09  0.17  4.34%   
The current 90-days correlation between Marks and Spencer and GUARDANT HEALTH CL is -0.09 (i.e., Good diversification). The correlation of Marks is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.

Marks Correlation With Market

Good diversification

The correlation between Marks and Spencer and DJI is -0.01 (i.e., Good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Marks and Spencer and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
  
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Marks could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Marks when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Marks - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Marks and Spencer to buy it.

Moving together with Marks Stock

  0.61DBPD Xtrackers ShortDAXPairCorr

Moving against Marks Stock

  0.899EE ZINZINO AB BPairCorr
  0.69DL7A DillardsPairCorr
  0.693RKU RYOHIN UNSPADR/1PairCorr
  0.66E908 Lyxor 1PairCorr
  0.6DBPE Xtrackers LevDAXPairCorr
  0.49FDO Macys IncPairCorr
  0.4874F LIFE BANC SPLITPairCorr
  0.41XTP Sino AGPairCorr

Related Correlations Analysis

Click cells to compare fundamentals   Check Volatility   Backtest Portfolio

Correlation Matchups

Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.
High positive correlations   
BVF5GH
CLHHTW
HTWSDA
CLHSDA
SDA6E5
HTW6E5
  
High negative correlations   
7G95GH
CLHCH5
HTWCH5
CH5SDA
7G9BVF
CH56E5

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Marks Stock performing well and Marks Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Marks' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Be your own money manager

Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in Marks without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up the expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.

Did you try this?

Run Portfolio Analyzer Now

   

Portfolio Analyzer

Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
All  Next Launch Module

Marks Corporate Management

Elected by the shareholders, the Marks' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Marks inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Marks. The board's role is to monitor Marks' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Marks' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Marks' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.