Roebuck Food Correlations
| RFG Stock | 16.50 0.00 0.00% |
The correlation of Roebuck Food is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Roebuck |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Roebuck Food could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Roebuck Food when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Roebuck Food - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Roebuck Food Group to buy it.
Related Correlations Analysis
| Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Roebuck Stock performing well and Roebuck Food Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Roebuck Food's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0NW1 | 2.04 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 1.33 | 2.13 | 6.18 | 15.15 | |||
| MRC | 0.96 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 1.90 | 1.60 | 2.82 | 8.06 | |||
| VEIL | 1.17 | 0.05 | (0.01) | 0.24 | 2.41 | 2.00 | 11.19 | |||
| 0LRK | 1.20 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.44 | 1.14 | 2.98 | 8.99 | |||
| BRFI | 1.01 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 1.32 | 1.25 | 2.01 | 7.24 | |||
| ATR | 1.00 | 0.06 | (0.02) | 0.51 | 1.31 | 2.44 | 4.84 | |||
| 0R2L | 1.49 | (0.15) | 0.00 | (0.55) | 0.00 | 2.44 | 14.01 |
Be your own money manager
Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in Roebuck Food without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up the expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.Did you try this?
Run Earnings Calls Now
Earnings CallsCheck upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges |
| All Next | Launch Module |
Roebuck Food Corporate Management
Elected by the shareholders, the Roebuck Food's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Roebuck Food inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Roebuck. The board's role is to monitor Roebuck Food's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Roebuck Food's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Roebuck Food's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Jonathan Horsman | Compliance Technical | Profile | |
| Mick Bates | Managing South | Profile | |
| Jonathan Drainey | Head Innovation | Profile | |
| Kevin Hancock | Chief Officer | Profile |