High Arctic Company Executives
| HWO Stock | CAD 0.86 0.01 1.18% |
High Arctic employs about 15 people. The company is managed by 8 executives with a total tenure of roughly 12 years, averaging almost 1.0 years of service per executive, having 1.88 employees per reported executive. Analysis of High Arctic's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Michael Maguire President Vice-President of International Operations |
High |
High Arctic Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0159) % which means that it has lost $0.0159 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.0387) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. High Arctic's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well High Arctic manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, High Arctic's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 21st of July 2025, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.96, though Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to (0.11). At this time, High Arctic's Return On Assets are very stable compared to the past year.As of the 21st of July 2025, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 29.7 M, while Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop about 11.8 M.
High Arctic Workforce Comparison
High Arctic Energy is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Energy industry is currently estimated at about 6,529. High Arctic adds roughly 15.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Energy industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 2.51 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is normal as compared to the sector avarege. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of (0.05) %, which suggests for every $100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating loss of $0.05. High Arctic Energy Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. High Arctic Energy Price Series Summation is a cross summation of High Arctic price series and its benchmark/peer.
High Arctic Notable Stakeholders
A High Arctic stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as High Arctic often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. High Arctic's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting High Arctic's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Michael Maguire | Vice-President of International Operations | Profile | |
| JD Morrical | VP Marketing | Profile | |
| Justin Morrical | VP Marketing | Profile | |
| Lonn Bate | Interim Officer | Profile | |
| Trevor Barker | General Operations | Profile | |
| Stephen Lambert | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Samuel Ward | VP PNG | Profile | |
| Michael CA | Ex Chairman | Profile |
About High Arctic Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as High Arctic Energy often depends on how effective the management is. High Arctic management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of High management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the High management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.99 | 1.04 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.11) | (0.11) | |
| Return On Assets | 0.92 | 0.96 | |
| Return On Equity | 1.34 | 1.41 |
High Arctic Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as High Arctic use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare High Arctic within its industry.High Arctic Manpower Efficiency
Return on High Arctic Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 698K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 1.3M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 141.1K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 264.6K | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 179.5K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 336.5K |
Other Information on Investing in High Stock
High Arctic financial ratios help investors to determine whether High Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in High with respect to the benefits of owning High Arctic security.