Minerals 260 (Australia) Insiders
MI6 Stock | 0.12 0.00 0.00% |
Minerals 260 employs about 5 people. The company is managed by 5 executives with a total tenure of roughly 12 years, averaging almost 2.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Breaking down Minerals 260's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
BBus CA CFO CFO Secretary |
BSc BSc Director MD Director |
Minerals |
Minerals 260 Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.2871) % which means that it has lost $0.2871 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.4662) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Minerals 260's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Minerals 260 manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Minerals 260 Workforce Comparison
Minerals 260 is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Materials industry is now estimated at about 10.0. Minerals 260 totals roughly 5.0 in number of employees claiming about 50% of all equities under Materials industry.
Minerals 260 Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Minerals 260 Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Minerals 260 price series and its benchmark/peer.
Minerals 260 Notable Stakeholders
A Minerals 260 stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Minerals 260 often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Minerals 260's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Minerals 260's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
BBus CA | CFO Secretary | Profile | |
BSc BSc | MD Director | Profile | |
BCom BSc | MD Director | Profile | |
Luke McFadyen | Managing Director | Profile | |
Matthew BSc | Exploration Manager | Profile |
About Minerals 260 Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Minerals 260 often depends on how effective the management is. Minerals 260 management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Minerals management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Minerals management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Minerals 260's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Minerals 260. Check Minerals 260's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Minerals 260's management manipulating its earnings.
Minerals 260 Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Minerals 260 use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Minerals 260 within its industry.Minerals 260 Manpower Efficiency
Return on Minerals 260 Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 117.8K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 117.8K | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 1.5M | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 1.5M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 2.1M | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 2.1M |
Additional Tools for Minerals Stock Analysis
When running Minerals 260's price analysis, check to measure Minerals 260's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Minerals 260 is operating at the current time. Most of Minerals 260's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Minerals 260's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Minerals 260's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Minerals 260 to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.