Correlation Between Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fortune Brands Home and Concurrent Technologies Plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fortune Brands with a short position of Concurrent Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies.
Diversification Opportunities for Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies
-0.67 | Correlation Coefficient |
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Fortune and Concurrent is -0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fortune Brands Home and Concurrent Technologies Plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Concurrent Technologies and Fortune Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fortune Brands Home are associated (or correlated) with Concurrent Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Concurrent Technologies has no effect on the direction of Fortune Brands i.e., Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fortune Brands is expected to generate 9.68 times less return on investment than Concurrent Technologies. In addition to that, Fortune Brands is 1.43 times more volatile than Concurrent Technologies Plc. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Concurrent Technologies Plc is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 16,134 in Concurrent Technologies Plc on April 23, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2,466 from holding Concurrent Technologies Plc or generate 15.28% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 74.19% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Fortune Brands Home vs. Concurrent Technologies Plc
Performance |
Timeline |
Fortune Brands Home |
Concurrent Technologies |
Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies
The main advantage of trading using opposite Fortune Brands and Concurrent Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fortune Brands position performs unexpectedly, Concurrent Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Concurrent Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Concurrent Technologies' long position.Fortune Brands vs. PPHE Hotel Group | Fortune Brands vs. Canadian General Investments | Fortune Brands vs. Melia Hotels | Fortune Brands vs. Morgan Advanced Materials |
Concurrent Technologies vs. Heavitree Brewery | Concurrent Technologies vs. Auto Trader Group | Concurrent Technologies vs. Batm Advanced Communications | Concurrent Technologies vs. Finnair Oyj |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk |