Correlation Between ABL and XMX

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both ABL and XMX at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining ABL and XMX into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between ABL and XMX, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on ABL and XMX and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in ABL with a short position of XMX. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of ABL and XMX.

Diversification Opportunities for ABL and XMX

-0.37

Correlation Coefficient

ABL  XMX

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between ABL and XMX is -0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding ABL and XMX in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on XMX and ABL is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on ABL are associated (or correlated) with XMX. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of XMX has no effect on the direction of ABL i.e., ABL and XMX go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between ABL and XMX

If you would invest  1.28  in ABL on February 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding ABL or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	4.76%
Values	Daily Returns

ABL  vs.  XMX

ABL

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days ABL has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, ABL is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

XMX

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in XMX are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, XMX exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with ABL and XMX

The main advantage of trading using opposite ABL and XMX positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if ABL position performs unexpectedly, XMX can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in XMX will offset losses from the drop in XMX's long position.

The idea behind ABL and XMX pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.