Correlation Between Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Australian Agricultural and The Goldman Sachs, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Australian Agricultural with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs.
Diversification Opportunities for Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs
-0.43 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Australian and Goldman is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Australian Agricultural and The Goldman Sachs in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs and Australian Agricultural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Australian Agricultural are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs has no effect on the direction of Australian Agricultural i.e., Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs
Assuming the 90 days horizon Australian Agricultural is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Australian Agricultural is 1.02 times more volatile than The Goldman Sachs. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 47,635 in The Goldman Sachs on April 25, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 12,025 from holding The Goldman Sachs or generate 25.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Australian Agricultural vs. The Goldman Sachs
Performance |
Timeline |
Australian Agricultural |
Goldman Sachs |
Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs
The main advantage of trading using opposite Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Australian Agricultural position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.The idea behind Australian Agricultural and The Goldman Sachs pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Goldman Sachs vs. KENEDIX OFFICE INV | Goldman Sachs vs. United Breweries Co | Goldman Sachs vs. RETAIL FOOD GROUP | Goldman Sachs vs. THAI BEVERAGE |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges |