Correlation Between Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Australian Agricultural and The Goldman Sachs, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Australian Agricultural with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs

-0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Australian and Goldman is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Australian Agricultural and The Goldman Sachs in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs and Australian Agricultural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Australian Agricultural are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs has no effect on the direction of Australian Agricultural i.e., Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Australian Agricultural is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Australian Agricultural is 1.02 times more volatile than The Goldman Sachs. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  47,635  in The Goldman Sachs on April 25, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  12,025  from holding The Goldman Sachs or generate 25.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Australian Agricultural  vs.  The Goldman Sachs

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Australian Agricultural 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Australian Agricultural has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Australian Agricultural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Goldman Sachs 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in The Goldman Sachs are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Goldman Sachs reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Australian Agricultural and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Australian Agricultural position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Australian Agricultural and The Goldman Sachs pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges