Correlation Between Bird Construction and Maple Leaf

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bird Construction and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bird Construction and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bird Construction and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bird Construction and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bird Construction with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bird Construction and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Bird Construction and Maple Leaf

0.96

Correlation Coefficient

Bird Construction  Maple Leaf

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bird and Maple is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bird Construction and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Bird Construction is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bird Construction are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Bird Construction i.e., Bird Construction and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bird Construction and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bird Construction is expected to generate 1.45 times more return on investment than Maple Leaf. However, Bird Construction is 1.45 times more volatile than Maple Leaf Foods. It trades about 0.34 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,076  in Bird Construction on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  894.00  from holding Bird Construction or generate 43.06% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Bird Construction  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

Bird Construction

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bird Construction are ranked lower than 26 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Bird Construction displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Maple Leaf Foods

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Maple Leaf displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Bird Construction and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bird Construction and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bird Construction position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.

The idea behind Bird Construction and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.