Correlation Between Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Berkshire Hathaway CDR and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Berkshire Hathaway with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf

-0.94

Correlation Coefficient

Berkshire Hathaway  Maple Leaf

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Berkshire and Maple is -0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Berkshire Hathaway CDR and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Berkshire Hathaway is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Berkshire Hathaway CDR are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Berkshire Hathaway i.e., Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Berkshire Hathaway CDR is expected to under-perform the Maple Leaf. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Berkshire Hathaway CDR is 1.13 times less risky than Maple Leaf. The stock trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.29 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,445  in Maple Leaf Foods on April 25, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  548.00  from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 22.41% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Berkshire Hathaway CDR  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

Berkshire Hathaway CDR

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Berkshire Hathaway CDR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Maple Leaf Foods

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very abnormal forward indicators, Maple Leaf displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Berkshire Hathaway and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Berkshire Hathaway position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.

The idea behind Berkshire Hathaway CDR and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.