Correlation Between Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Pro Blend Maximum Term, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Pro-blend(r) Maximum. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

0.93
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) is 0.93. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Pro Blend Maximum Term in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Pro-blend(r) Maximum and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Pro-blend(r) Maximum. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Pro-blend(r) Maximum has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 2.09 times more return on investment than Pro-blend(r) Maximum. However, Citigroup is 2.09 times more volatile than Pro Blend Maximum Term. It trades about 0.41 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Pro Blend Maximum Term is currently generating about 0.26 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,404  in Citigroup on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,941  from holding Citigroup or generate 45.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Pro Blend Maximum Term

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 32 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Pro-blend(r) Maximum 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Pro Blend Maximum Term are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Pro-blend(r) Maximum may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Pro-blend(r) Maximum positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Pro-blend(r) Maximum can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Pro-blend(r) Maximum will offset losses from the drop in Pro-blend(r) Maximum's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Pro Blend Maximum Term pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals