Correlation Between CI Global and BMO Global
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CI Global and BMO Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CI Global and BMO Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CI Global Infrastructure and BMO Global Infrastructure, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CI Global and BMO Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CI Global with a short position of BMO Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CI Global and BMO Global.
Diversification Opportunities for CI Global and BMO Global
-0.53 | Correlation Coefficient |
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between CINF and BMO is -0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CI Global Infrastructure and BMO Global Infrastructure in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BMO Global Infrastructure and CI Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CI Global Infrastructure are associated (or correlated) with BMO Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BMO Global Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of CI Global i.e., CI Global and BMO Global go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between CI Global and BMO Global
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon CI Global Infrastructure is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than BMO Global. However, CI Global Infrastructure is 1.88 times less risky than BMO Global. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. BMO Global Infrastructure is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 2,749 in CI Global Infrastructure on April 24, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 176.00 from holding CI Global Infrastructure or generate 6.4% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
CI Global Infrastructure vs. BMO Global Infrastructure
Performance |
Timeline |
CI Global Infrastructure |
BMO Global Infrastructure |
CI Global and BMO Global Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with CI Global and BMO Global
The main advantage of trading using opposite CI Global and BMO Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CI Global position performs unexpectedly, BMO Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in BMO Global will offset losses from the drop in BMO Global's long position.CI Global vs. CI Global REIT | CI Global vs. CI Global Real | CI Global vs. CI Marret Alternative | CI Global vs. CI Global Financial |
BMO Global vs. BMO Equal Weight | BMO Global vs. BMO Low Volatility | BMO Global vs. BMO Equal Weight | BMO Global vs. BMO MSCI Emerging |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.
Other Complementary Tools
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing |