Correlation Between Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Computer Modelling Group and Rogers Communications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Computer Modelling with a short position of Rogers Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications

-0.1

Correlation Coefficient

Computer Modelling  Rogers Communications

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Computer and Rogers is -0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Computer Modelling Group and Rogers Communications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rogers Communications and Computer Modelling is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Computer Modelling Group are associated (or correlated) with Rogers Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rogers Communications has no effect on the direction of Computer Modelling i.e., Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Computer Modelling is expected to generate 17.41 times less return on investment than Rogers Communications. In addition to that, Computer Modelling is 2.25 times more volatile than Rogers Communications. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Rogers Communications is currently generating about 0.28 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,901  in Rogers Communications on April 24, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  950.00  from holding Rogers Communications or generate 24.35% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Computer Modelling Group  vs.  Rogers Communications

Computer Modelling

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Computer Modelling Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, Computer Modelling is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Rogers Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Rogers Communications are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unfluctuating basic indicators, Rogers Communications unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Computer Modelling and Rogers Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Computer Modelling position performs unexpectedly, Rogers Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rogers Communications will offset losses from the drop in Rogers Communications' long position.

The idea behind Computer Modelling Group and Rogers Communications pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.