Correlation Between Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Medical Facilities with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Medical and Maple is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Medical Facilities is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Medical Facilities are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Medical Facilities i.e., Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days horizon Medical Facilities is expected to generate 6.3 times less return on investment than Maple Leaf. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Medical Facilities is 1.0 times less risky than Maple Leaf. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.31 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,428  in Maple Leaf Foods on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  609.00  from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 25.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Medical Facilities  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Medical Facilities 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Medical Facilities are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Medical Facilities is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Maple Leaf displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Medical Facilities position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Medical Facilities and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA