Correlation Between Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guidepath Absolute Return and California Municipal Portfolio, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guidepath(r) Absolute with a short position of California Municipal. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal.
Diversification Opportunities for Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal
0.94 | Correlation Coefficient |
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Guidepath(r) and California is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guidepath Absolute Return and California Municipal Portfolio in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on California Municipal and Guidepath(r) Absolute is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guidepath Absolute Return are associated (or correlated) with California Municipal. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of California Municipal has no effect on the direction of Guidepath(r) Absolute i.e., Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal
Assuming the 90 days horizon Guidepath Absolute Return is expected to generate 1.87 times more return on investment than California Municipal. However, Guidepath(r) Absolute is 1.87 times more volatile than California Municipal Portfolio. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. California Municipal Portfolio is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest 943.00 in Guidepath Absolute Return on April 25, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 16.00 from holding Guidepath Absolute Return or generate 1.7% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Guidepath Absolute Return vs. California Municipal Portfolio
Performance |
Timeline |
Guidepath Absolute Return |
California Municipal |
Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal
The main advantage of trading using opposite Guidepath(r) Absolute and California Municipal positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guidepath(r) Absolute position performs unexpectedly, California Municipal can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in California Municipal will offset losses from the drop in California Municipal's long position.Guidepath(r) Absolute vs. Tiaa Cref Real Estate | Guidepath(r) Absolute vs. Global Real Estate | Guidepath(r) Absolute vs. Rems Real Estate | Guidepath(r) Absolute vs. Redwood Real Estate |
California Municipal vs. New York Municipal | California Municipal vs. Oppenheimer Rochester Ltdterm | California Municipal vs. New York Municipal |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.
Other Complementary Tools
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |