Correlation Between General Mills and SCIENCE IN

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both General Mills and SCIENCE IN at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining General Mills and SCIENCE IN into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Mills and SCIENCE IN SPORT, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on General Mills and SCIENCE IN and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in General Mills with a short position of SCIENCE IN. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of General Mills and SCIENCE IN.

Diversification Opportunities for General Mills and SCIENCE IN

-0.75

Correlation Coefficient

General Mills  SCIENCE IN

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between General and SCIENCE is -0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Mills and SCIENCE IN SPORT in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SCIENCE IN SPORT and General Mills is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Mills are associated (or correlated) with SCIENCE IN. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SCIENCE IN SPORT has no effect on the direction of General Mills i.e., General Mills and SCIENCE IN go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between General Mills and SCIENCE IN

Assuming the 90 days horizon General Mills is expected to under-perform the SCIENCE IN. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, General Mills is 1.17 times less risky than SCIENCE IN. The stock trades about -0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The SCIENCE IN SPORT is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  35.00  in SCIENCE IN SPORT on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.00  from holding SCIENCE IN SPORT or generate 5.71% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	62.5%
Values	Daily Returns

General Mills  vs.  SCIENCE IN SPORT

General Mills

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days General Mills has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in August 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

SCIENCE IN SPORT

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Over the last 90 days SCIENCE IN SPORT has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, SCIENCE IN may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Pair Trading with General Mills and SCIENCE IN

The main advantage of trading using opposite General Mills and SCIENCE IN positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if General Mills position performs unexpectedly, SCIENCE IN can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SCIENCE IN will offset losses from the drop in SCIENCE IN's long position.

The idea behind General Mills and SCIENCE IN SPORT pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .