Correlation Between Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls Industries, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lockheed Martin with a short position of Huntington Ingalls. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls.

Diversification Opportunities for Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lockheed and Huntington is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls Industries in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Huntington Ingalls and Lockheed Martin is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lockheed Martin are associated (or correlated) with Huntington Ingalls. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Huntington Ingalls has no effect on the direction of Lockheed Martin i.e., Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Lockheed Martin is expected to generate 4.01 times less return on investment than Huntington Ingalls. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Lockheed Martin is 1.28 times less risky than Huntington Ingalls. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Huntington Ingalls Industries is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  19,383  in Huntington Ingalls Industries on March 11, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,266  from holding Huntington Ingalls Industries or generate 16.85% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lockheed Martin  vs.  Huntington Ingalls Industries

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lockheed Martin 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lockheed Martin are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable primary indicators, Lockheed Martin is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Huntington Ingalls 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Huntington Ingalls Industries are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly uncertain forward indicators, Huntington Ingalls demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lockheed Martin position performs unexpectedly, Huntington Ingalls can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Huntington Ingalls will offset losses from the drop in Huntington Ingalls' long position.
The idea behind Lockheed Martin and Huntington Ingalls Industries pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals