Correlation Between Maple Leaf and Bird Construction

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and Bird Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and Bird Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and Bird Construction, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and Bird Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of Bird Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and Bird Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and Bird Construction

0.95
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Maple and Bird is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and Bird Construction in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bird Construction and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with Bird Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bird Construction has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and Bird Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and Bird Construction

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf is expected to generate 1.85 times less return on investment than Bird Construction. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Maple Leaf Foods is 1.46 times less risky than Bird Construction. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bird Construction is currently generating about 0.36 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,047  in Bird Construction on April 23, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  923.00  from holding Bird Construction or generate 45.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  Bird Construction

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Maple Leaf displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Bird Construction 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bird Construction are ranked lower than 28 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Bird Construction displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Maple Leaf and Bird Construction Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and Bird Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and Bird Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Bird Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bird Construction will offset losses from the drop in Bird Construction's long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and Bird Construction pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios