Correlation Between Microsoft and Maple Leaf

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Maple Leaf

0.91

Correlation Coefficient

Microsoft  Maple Leaf

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Maple is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Microsoft is expected to generate 1.13 times more return on investment than Maple Leaf. However, Microsoft is 1.13 times more volatile than Maple Leaf Foods. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  31,243  in Microsoft on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  12,472  from holding Microsoft or generate 39.92% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

Microsoft

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Maple Leaf Foods

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Maple Leaf unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.

The idea behind Microsoft and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.