Correlation Between Retail Estates and Scientific Games

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Retail Estates and Scientific Games at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Retail Estates and Scientific Games into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Retail Estates NV and Scientific Games, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Retail Estates and Scientific Games and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Retail Estates with a short position of Scientific Games. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Retail Estates and Scientific Games.

Diversification Opportunities for Retail Estates and Scientific Games

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Retail and Scientific is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Retail Estates NV and Scientific Games in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scientific Games and Retail Estates is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Retail Estates NV are associated (or correlated) with Scientific Games. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scientific Games has no effect on the direction of Retail Estates i.e., Retail Estates and Scientific Games go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Retail Estates and Scientific Games

Assuming the 90 days horizon Retail Estates is expected to generate 2.46 times less return on investment than Scientific Games. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Retail Estates NV is 3.14 times less risky than Scientific Games. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Scientific Games is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,650  in Scientific Games on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,700  from holding Scientific Games or generate 25.56% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Retail Estates NV  vs.  Scientific Games

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Retail Estates NV 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Retail Estates NV are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Retail Estates may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scientific Games are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Scientific Games reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Retail Estates and Scientific Games Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Retail Estates and Scientific Games

The main advantage of trading using opposite Retail Estates and Scientific Games positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Retail Estates position performs unexpectedly, Scientific Games can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will offset losses from the drop in Scientific Games' long position.
The idea behind Retail Estates NV and Scientific Games pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins