Correlation Between Rogers Communications and China Communications
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Rogers Communications and China Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Rogers Communications and China Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Rogers Communications and China Communications Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Rogers Communications and China Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Rogers Communications with a short position of China Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Rogers Communications and China Communications.
Diversification Opportunities for Rogers Communications and China Communications
0.61 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Rogers and China is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Rogers Communications and China Communications Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Communications and Rogers Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Rogers Communications are associated (or correlated) with China Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Communications has no effect on the direction of Rogers Communications i.e., Rogers Communications and China Communications go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Rogers Communications and China Communications
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Rogers Communications is expected to generate 0.55 times more return on investment than China Communications. However, Rogers Communications is 1.83 times less risky than China Communications. It trades about 0.3 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Communications Services is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest 2,170 in Rogers Communications on April 21, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 670.00 from holding Rogers Communications or generate 30.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Rogers Communications vs. China Communications Services
Performance |
Timeline |
Rogers Communications |
China Communications |
Rogers Communications and China Communications Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Rogers Communications and China Communications
The main advantage of trading using opposite Rogers Communications and China Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Rogers Communications position performs unexpectedly, China Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Communications will offset losses from the drop in China Communications' long position.Rogers Communications vs. Corsair Gaming | Rogers Communications vs. CeoTronics AG | Rogers Communications vs. Q2M Managementberatung AG | Rogers Communications vs. LAir Liquide SA |
China Communications vs. Columbia Sportswear | China Communications vs. PLAYWAY SA ZY 10 | China Communications vs. Ming Le Sports | China Communications vs. S E BANKEN A |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Other Complementary Tools
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities |