Correlation Between Russell Investments and IA Clarington

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Russell Investments and IA Clarington at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Russell Investments and IA Clarington into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Russell Investments Real and IA Clarington Loomis, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Russell Investments and IA Clarington and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Russell Investments with a short position of IA Clarington. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Russell Investments and IA Clarington.

Diversification Opportunities for Russell Investments and IA Clarington

0.91
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Russell and IGAF is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Russell Investments Real and IA Clarington Loomis in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on IA Clarington Loomis and Russell Investments is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Russell Investments Real are associated (or correlated) with IA Clarington. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of IA Clarington Loomis has no effect on the direction of Russell Investments i.e., Russell Investments and IA Clarington go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Russell Investments and IA Clarington

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Russell Investments is expected to generate 1.43 times less return on investment than IA Clarington. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Russell Investments Real is 1.22 times less risky than IA Clarington. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. IA Clarington Loomis is currently generating about 0.21 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,410  in IA Clarington Loomis on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  150.00  from holding IA Clarington Loomis or generate 10.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Russell Investments Real  vs.  IA Clarington Loomis

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Russell Investments Real 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Russell Investments Real are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very uncertain basic indicators, Russell Investments may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
IA Clarington Loomis 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in IA Clarington Loomis are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, IA Clarington may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Russell Investments and IA Clarington Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Russell Investments and IA Clarington

The main advantage of trading using opposite Russell Investments and IA Clarington positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Russell Investments position performs unexpectedly, IA Clarington can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in IA Clarington will offset losses from the drop in IA Clarington's long position.
The idea behind Russell Investments Real and IA Clarington Loomis pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance