Correlation Between Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sabre Insurance Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sabre Insurance with a short position of Concurrent Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies

0.26
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sabre and Concurrent is 0.26. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sabre Insurance Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Concurrent Technologies and Sabre Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sabre Insurance Group are associated (or correlated) with Concurrent Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Concurrent Technologies has no effect on the direction of Sabre Insurance i.e., Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Sabre Insurance Group is expected to generate 0.61 times more return on investment than Concurrent Technologies. However, Sabre Insurance Group is 1.65 times less risky than Concurrent Technologies. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Concurrent Technologies Plc is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  12,700  in Sabre Insurance Group on April 23, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,380  from holding Sabre Insurance Group or generate 18.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sabre Insurance Group  vs.  Concurrent Technologies Plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sabre Insurance Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sabre Insurance Group are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady basic indicators, Sabre Insurance unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Concurrent Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Concurrent Technologies Plc are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Concurrent Technologies exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sabre Insurance and Concurrent Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sabre Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Concurrent Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Concurrent Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Concurrent Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Sabre Insurance Group and Concurrent Technologies Plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.