Correlation Between Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane and Uber Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Infrastrutture Wireless with a short position of Uber Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Infrastrutture and Uber is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Infrastrutture Wireless Italia and Uber Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Uber Technologies and Infrastrutture Wireless is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane are associated (or correlated) with Uber Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Uber Technologies has no effect on the direction of Infrastrutture Wireless i.e., Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies

Assuming the 90 days horizon Infrastrutture Wireless is expected to generate 2.76 times less return on investment than Uber Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane is 2.19 times less risky than Uber Technologies. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Uber Technologies is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,438  in Uber Technologies on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,351  from holding Uber Technologies or generate 20.98% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Infrastrutture Wireless Italia  vs.  Uber Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Infrastrutture Wireless 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Infrastrutture Wireless may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
Uber Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Uber Technologies are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Uber Technologies reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Infrastrutture Wireless and Uber Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Infrastrutture Wireless position performs unexpectedly, Uber Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Uber Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Uber Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane and Uber Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm