Correlation Between CellaVision and Clavister Holding

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CellaVision and Clavister Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CellaVision and Clavister Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between CellaVision AB and Clavister Holding AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CellaVision and Clavister Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CellaVision with a short position of Clavister Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CellaVision and Clavister Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for CellaVision and Clavister Holding

0.35

Correlation Coefficient

CellaVision  Clavister Holding

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between CellaVision and Clavister is 0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CellaVision AB and Clavister Holding AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Clavister Holding and CellaVision is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CellaVision AB are associated (or correlated) with Clavister Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Clavister Holding has no effect on the direction of CellaVision i.e., CellaVision and Clavister Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between CellaVision and Clavister Holding

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon CellaVision is expected to generate 1.1 times less return on investment than Clavister Holding. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, CellaVision AB is 1.22 times less risky than Clavister Holding. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Clavister Holding AB is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  390.00  in Clavister Holding AB on April 25, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  39.00  from holding Clavister Holding AB or generate 10.0% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

CellaVision AB  vs.  Clavister Holding AB

CellaVision AB

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CellaVision AB are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, CellaVision unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Clavister Holding

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Clavister Holding AB are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Clavister Holding unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with CellaVision and Clavister Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite CellaVision and Clavister Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CellaVision position performs unexpectedly, Clavister Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Clavister Holding will offset losses from the drop in Clavister Holding's long position.

The idea behind CellaVision AB and Clavister Holding AB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.